If this kind of thing can happen by mistake - why not give us control to make it happen deliberately? Īnyway, I'm just thinking aloud on a late Friday afternoon - and though I would try Ankur's cheat. The google-maps-utility-library-v3 can be used to make this easier.
The author of this topic would like to model a world 2km below ground ( )Īs it happens, the same author has found a failure in LumenRT in which his terrain disappeared. 1 Yes, you can use the Google Maps V3 to switch between Google Maps and the Google Earth Plug-in. Someone modeling DNA strands or atomic particles would want similar control. If I were asked to model and visualize a new module bolted onto the ISS in LumenRT, I would also like to have control over my modeling environment. I am looking for a way to possibly generate that map from the 3d model of the earth that Google provides as I only need it for a small area and it needs to be high accuracy. Other worlds exist, such as outer space or the microscopic world in a petri dish. Except as an overlay and of the Earth of course. Yes, it is "real time" too - but why could that not be the starting point for building this software? Granular control over environmental variables should also be possible. Zooming in, you'll start to get high-resolution in most places. When you zoom out, you will see the nice, pretty global coverage produced from a mosaic of many Landsat scenes, which have a native resolution of 30m (15m pan-sharpened). I think Ankur might mean LumenRT is intended as "real world" software, so that all geometry is subject to real world environmental influences (light, wind, etc.). The resolution of imagery in Google Earth varies depending on the source of the data. Why should it not be possible to switch off the sky? Or terrain/ base plane?
0 kommentar(er)
